Difference between revisions of "Talk:Wolfire Wiki Editing Standards"

From Wolfire Games Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
Line 66: Line 66:
  
 
--[[User:Conner36|Conner36]] 15:39, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
 
--[[User:Conner36|Conner36]] 15:39, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
 +
 +
[[Category: Editing Standards]]
 +
[[Category: Weapons]]

Revision as of 15:40, 22 June 2011

Weapons (anything lower than this point should be in a weapons page not a sub category. If you have a crucial detail for that weapon and there is no page, don't think you have to make an entirely new page. Add your words to the file's own page for example look at the staff. )

So who is to decide if there should be a weapon page or not? I don't agree with the last sentence because of two reasons:

The reason why its better to have a page for every weapon is because its simply easier to manage them on their own page then to track every single occurence on collection pages like Equipment_and_Weapons or Dogs#Weaponry (which I have combined previously because they contained duplicates of the same information)

--Steppenlaeufer 08:13, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Ok, but in my defense, what I'm doing is pretty much like bioware's doing (we could argue that the staff (I found an unused picture only about staves)):

But COD also does a cross between:

Either way, after we decide what to do with the weapons category, we need templates like:

Thanks very much for helping with the editing standards. You're right about "So who is to decide if there should be a weapon page or not?". The only way to decide is debate and argue for your most liked example and then decide which one most people think is best. I'm always happy to go through one by one and edit my mistakes for the better.

--Conner36 13:33, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

I agree that pictures should have some sort of meta-data as shown in [1], its easier to find page-related pictures if they have a good description. I didn't mean to leave image pages blank like shown in [2], but to only provide picture related content on the picture page and not article/page content. In my opinion most people using a wiki system (including myself) don't read through the picture-page of a posted picture.

A naming convention for pictures could be useful but is pretty hard to establish for pictures of something that can't be described with one word, a good description in the metadata is probably superior.

I also agree on the template for the weapons category (if we decide to keep the category), this would be very useful and also nice looking.

Thanks for your quick reply, greetings from Austria --Steppenlaeufer 15:06, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Maybe we should add subcategories from this list (from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_melee_weapons):

  • Blunt weapons
  • Chain weapons
  • Spears
  • Pole weapons
  • Knives
  • Swords and fencing
  • Axes
  • Glove Weapons
  • Improvised Weapons
  • Miscellaneous weapons

Which idea do you like, no page for "spears" but a template page (saves on editing for the main weapons page) for each specific spear? or is it better to have a page for each weapon and the weapons template instead of a main weapons page?

I'm more for a weapons template and no main page.

Either way we need to come up with a system that can handle the future weapons. The tricky thing is making a template or page to handle different races and groups within the races with their own specific weapons in their own categories. All while being easy to navigate. Things may get ugly pretty fast.

--Conner36 15:39, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://wiki.wolfire.com/index.php?title=Talk:Wolfire_Wiki_Editing_Standards&oldid=3312"